![]() ![]() It is possible to attack the accuracy and credibility of these methods. Method of calculating speed: Police officers use radar, laser, lidar, pace, vascar, visual estimates, aerial surveillance and photo enforcement to calculate speed. Your answers to those questions may be inadmissible if the police officers did not follow the existing laws that govern whether the answers to these questions were voluntary and proper under the law. ![]() Mueller’s extended experience to work for you may mean the difference between being convicted and acquitted.Ĭhallenging the police officer’s questioning: Police officers ask questions with the intent of using your answers to support their case against you. Mueller has logged many hours arguing and defending criminal traffic cases. Specific elements must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for the prosecutor to obtain an aggressive driving conviction. Just because an officer disapproves of your alleged road rage, does not make it “aggressive driving” under the law. ![]() Mueller may even be able to persuade the prosecutor to dismiss or reduce the charge after reviewing the citation and police report with the prosecutor. ![]() An officer who may be accustomed to coming into court on civil traffic violations and prevailing with a much lower burden of proof may find himself or herself unprepared to meet the burden of proof in a criminal case.Īn experienced defense lawyer such as Karl A. Looking At Possible Defensesīurden of proof: Because aggressive driving is a criminal charge, you are entitled to all the protections given to anyone charged with a crime. The accused person’s driving must also be an immediate hazard to another person or vehicle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |